Website Examples: Difference between revisions

From Scribus Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'Category:Website === Good Examples === Sites that have ideas close to what we want to implement [http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Gallery Tango Icon Gallery] [http:…')
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
Sites that have ideas close to what we want to implement
Sites that have ideas close to what we want to implement


[http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Gallery Tango Icon Gallery]
* [http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Gallery Tango Icon Gallery] ''Errm, just a few lines of text???''--[[User:C schaefer|C schaefer]] 04:07, 11 December 2010 (CET)
* [http://www.ubuntu.com/ Ubuntu]
- I'm not fond of the large amount of space taken up by the graphics at the top
* http://www.ginetta.ch/


[http://www.ubuntu.com/ Ubuntu]


* http://www.ginetta.ch/
* http://mypaint.info/
* http://mypaint.info/
* http://www.nathive.org/
* http://www.nathive.org/
* http://fedoraproject.org/
- curiously, similar to the Ubuntu site. Again, a lot of wasted space at the top.
The iconic representations at the bottom are nice.
* gimp, inkscape, phatch.
* gimp, inkscape, phatch.
I think it's important to indicate what you think are good features of these sites. For each I see problems, or at least undesirable elements.

Latest revision as of 02:16, 12 December 2010

Good Examples

Sites that have ideas close to what we want to implement

- I'm not fond of the large amount of space taken up by the graphics at the top


- curiously, similar to the Ubuntu site. Again, a lot of wasted space at the top. The iconic representations at the bottom are nice.

  • gimp, inkscape, phatch.

I think it's important to indicate what you think are good features of these sites. For each I see problems, or at least undesirable elements.