Most Annoying Bugs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reformatted with 3 tiers) |
(→Brainstorming & Nominations: end of this section) |
||
| (97 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Announcement|Documentation and Organization|Function of this page is to track the Most Annoying Bugs that affect usage of Scribus and that meet the criteria listed below}} | {{Announcement|Documentation and Organization|Function of this page is to track the Most Annoying Bugs that affect usage of Scribus and that meet the criteria listed below}} | ||
=== | === Criteria === | ||
As for LibreOffice, Hard hacks should meet the below requirements : | |||
* Be | The most annoying bugs are the top most annoying and disruptive to daily workflow. | ||
As for LibreOffice, "Hard hacks" should meet the below requirements : | |||
* Be really annoying for a significant amount of people | |||
* Be relatively difficult to solve and/or track down | * Be relatively difficult to solve and/or track down | ||
* Crashes/data loss are good candidates but not necessary | * Crashes/data loss are good candidates but not necessary | ||
| Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
* Enhancement requests should NOT be on the list | * Enhancement requests should NOT be on the list | ||
As for Scribus, care has been taken when nominationg these "most annoying bugs" to the following criteria : | |||
* Bug can be reproduced | |||
* Bug impacts core of scribus mission | |||
* Bug impacts basic functionnalities | |||
* Bug doesnt require a rare combination of circumstances | |||
Here there are. | |||
= | = The Dirty Ten = | ||
== | <mantis> | ||
bugid = 11767, 12276,11574,11814,11420,11369,1752,6241,11995,11071 | |||
comment#11767 = styles, undo | |||
comment#12276 = styles, undo | |||
* | comment#11574 = styles | ||
comment#11814 = styles | |||
comment#11420 = styles | |||
comment#11369 = user interface, search | |||
comment#6241 = user interface | |||
comment#11995 = layout | |||
comment#11071 = layout | |||
</mantis> | |||
=== 3 categories === | |||
It appears MABs can be sorted in 3 categories : | |||
* layout related (right align tab, shrunk text, issue with endofparagraph glyph when right align, etc). See also '[http://bugs.scribus.net/search.php?tag_string=layout #layout]' tag on the bug tracker. There are some more very annoying layout issues (some being related to hyphenation) | |||
* styles related (object copy and paste from other document or from scrapbook, style import, undo messes styles, copy and paste messes styles ...). See also '[http://bugs.scribus.net/search.php?tag_string=styles #styles]' tag on the bug tracker | |||
* User interface related and search related | |||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
| Line 26: | Line 47: | ||
:* [https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/HardHacks LibreOffice Hardhacks] | :* [https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/HardHacks LibreOffice Hardhacks] | ||
:* [https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44446 LibreOffice Bugtacker labeled Hardhacks] | :* [https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44446 LibreOffice Bugtacker labeled Hardhacks] | ||
= Fixed Most Annoying Bugs = | |||
<mantis> | |||
header = true | |||
show = id, status, summary | |||
bugid = 11428, 12228 | |||
comment#11428 = This bug was destroyed by cbradney in [http://scribus.net/websvn/revision.php?repname=Scribus&path=%2Ftrunk%2FScribus%2F&rev=19179&peg=19179 r19179]. This bug did not even graduate to ''The Dirty Dozen | |||
comment#12228 = Bug Fixed prior to 1.5 release! | |||
</mantis> | |||
== Related == | |||
* [[Most Desired Features]] | |||
* [[Bugs_to_be_Buried]] | |||
[[Category:Development]] | [[Category:Development]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 23 May 2016
Criteria
The most annoying bugs are the top most annoying and disruptive to daily workflow.
As for LibreOffice, "Hard hacks" should meet the below requirements :
- Be really annoying for a significant amount of people
- Be relatively difficult to solve and/or track down
- Crashes/data loss are good candidates but not necessary
- Backtraces should be done on proposed hard hacks before they become accepted hard hacks
- Enhancement requests should NOT be on the list
As for Scribus, care has been taken when nominationg these "most annoying bugs" to the following criteria :
- Bug can be reproduced
- Bug impacts core of scribus mission
- Bug impacts basic functionnalities
- Bug doesnt require a rare combination of circumstances
Here there are.
The Dirty Ten
<mantis> bugid = 11767, 12276,11574,11814,11420,11369,1752,6241,11995,11071 comment#11767 = styles, undo comment#12276 = styles, undo comment#11574 = styles comment#11814 = styles comment#11420 = styles comment#11369 = user interface, search comment#6241 = user interface comment#11995 = layout comment#11071 = layout </mantis>
3 categories
It appears MABs can be sorted in 3 categories :
- layout related (right align tab, shrunk text, issue with endofparagraph glyph when right align, etc). See also '#layout' tag on the bug tracker. There are some more very annoying layout issues (some being related to hyphenation)
- styles related (object copy and paste from other document or from scrapbook, style import, undo messes styles, copy and paste messes styles ...). See also '#styles' tag on the bug tracker
- User interface related and search related
Background
- Thread on the ML started by JLuc on May 2014.
- Heavily inspired by the LibreOffice model:
Fixed Most Annoying Bugs
<mantis> header = true show = id, status, summary bugid = 11428, 12228 comment#11428 = This bug was destroyed by cbradney in r19179. This bug did not even graduate to The Dirty Dozen comment#12228 = Bug Fixed prior to 1.5 release! </mantis>