Most Annoying Bugs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Development]] | [[Category:Development]] | ||
=== Candidate criteria === | |||
As for LibreOffice, Hard hacks should meet the below requirements : | |||
* Be relatively annoying for a significant amount of people | |||
* Be relatively difficult to solve and/or track down | |||
* Crashes/data loss are good candidates but not necessary | |||
* Backtraces should be done on proposed hard hacks before they become accepted hard hacks | |||
* Enhancement requests should NOT be on the list | |||
== Candidates == | == Candidates == | ||
* Remove the "missing ghostscript" warning on startup and replace it with a warning shown when ghostscript is indeed needed | * Remove the "missing ghostscript" warning on startup and replace it with a warning shown when ghostscript is indeed needed | ||
Revision as of 20:16, 1 June 2014
The Dirty Dozen
Other Bugs
Background
- Thread on the ML started by JLuc on May 2014.
- Heavily inspired by the LibreOffice model:
Criteria
Candidate criteria
As for LibreOffice, Hard hacks should meet the below requirements :
- Be relatively annoying for a significant amount of people
- Be relatively difficult to solve and/or track down
- Crashes/data loss are good candidates but not necessary
- Backtraces should be done on proposed hard hacks before they become accepted hard hacks
- Enhancement requests should NOT be on the list
Candidates
- Remove the "missing ghostscript" warning on startup and replace it with a warning shown when ghostscript is indeed needed