Story editor (Project): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Category:Project =early draft= =user contributed use cases= john jason: <pre> Adobe initially targeted InDesign at QuarkXPress users. QuarkXPress never had a story editor, s...")
Revision as of 12:06, 14 December 2010
user contributed use cases
Adobe initially targeted InDesign at QuarkXPress users. QuarkXPress never had a story editor, so version 1.0 of InDesign came with no story editor. Eventually Adobe learned that lack of a story editor was costing them sales of InDesign to PageMaker users, as PageMaker had always had a story editor. Finally, in InDesign CS (or maybe it was 2.0) Adobe added a story editor to InDesign. Prior to going to InDesign I had used both PageMaker and QuarkXPress. I never much missed the story editor in InDesign, but when it finally appeared I found it occasionally useful. Suppose you have a story threaded through 20 frames on 20 pages. To edit the entire story in canvas view means you have to select a frame, do your editing, move down a page, select a frame, do your editing, and on and on. If you have a story editor you can edit the entire story all at once in one window. But to be efficient, the story editor needs to have all the features that are available in canvas view. That means the fonts have to appear the same - no more generic font for the story editor. And if you insert a glyph that does not exist in the font, no more faking it in the story editor. I use 1.3.9 and I still use the story editor a lot. I don't have a lot of long stories, but I do have long documents. Editing in canvas view is frequently painfully slow. But when the long document slowness is finally fixed I can do without the story editor quite easily. I'd rather we spent our development efforts on something more critical.