Scribus UI Analysis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* [http://le-radar.com/articles/scribusUI/scribusui2.pdf Scribus UI Analysis Part I] (53 pages, PDF version) | * [http://le-radar.com/articles/scribusUI/scribusui2.pdf Scribus UI Analysis Part I] (53 pages, PDF version) | ||
[[Media:scribusui.pdf |a pdf]] | |||
** [http://le-radar.com/articles/scribusUI/images/scribusUI.html HTML version] (with images) | ** [http://le-radar.com/articles/scribusUI/images/scribusUI.html HTML version] (with images) | ||
** [http://le-radar.com/articles/scribusUI/html/index.html HTML version] (without images) | ** [http://le-radar.com/articles/scribusUI/html/index.html HTML version] (without images) | ||
Revision as of 21:52, 29 November 2009
Cedric from LERADAR has performed an user interface analysis on Scribus, discussing how it compares with similar DTP application such as QuarkXpress. Also discussed is how it integrates with other FOSS graphical applications such as Inkscape and GIMP.
Scribus User Interface (UI) Analysis
- Scribus UI Analysis Part I (53 pages, PDF version)
a pdf
- HTML version (with images)
- HTML version (without images)
- Scribus UI Analysis Part II: response (24 pages, PDF version only)
According to the author, if you have any remark on the documents, you can reach him at cedric(AT)le-radar.com, or pygmee on #scribus at irc.freenode.net.
Feedback?
Please add your feedback to the study in this section.