Scribus UI Analysis: Difference between revisions

From Scribus Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Cedric from [http://le-radar.com/ LERADAR] has performed an user interface analysis on Scribus, discussing how it compares with commercial DTP such as QuarkXpress. Also discussed is how it integrates with other FOSS graphical applications such as Inkscape and GIMP.
Cedric from [http://le-radar.com/ LERADAR] has performed an user interface analysis on Scribus, discussing how it compares with commercial [[DTP]] such as QuarkXpress. Also discussed is how it integrates with other FOSS graphical applications such as [[Inkscape]] and [[GIMP]].
 


Scribus User Interface (UI) Analysis
Scribus User Interface (UI) Analysis
Line 8: Line 9:


* [http://le-radar.com/articles/scribusUI/scribusUIReponses.pdf Scribus UI Analysis Part II: response] (24 pages, PDF version only)
* [http://le-radar.com/articles/scribusUI/scribusUIReponses.pdf Scribus UI Analysis Part II: response] (24 pages, PDF version only)


According to the author, if you have any remark on the documents, you can reach him at cedric(AT)le-radar.com, or pygmee on #scribus at irc.freenode.net.
According to the author, if you have any remark on the documents, you can reach him at cedric(AT)le-radar.com, or pygmee on #scribus at irc.freenode.net.

Revision as of 19:40, 22 January 2006

Cedric from LERADAR has performed an user interface analysis on Scribus, discussing how it compares with commercial DTP such as QuarkXpress. Also discussed is how it integrates with other FOSS graphical applications such as Inkscape and GIMP.


Scribus User Interface (UI) Analysis


According to the author, if you have any remark on the documents, you can reach him at cedric(AT)le-radar.com, or pygmee on #scribus at irc.freenode.net.